Re: [PATCH] i386: always clear bss

[H. Peter Anvin]

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> 
> Yes, that's more or less the same code, aside from using 0x40(%esi) as a
> stack.  Would that be OK here?
> 

I saw the 0x40(%esi) stack stuff, and I'm utterly puzzled by it.  There
is no reason one can't set up %esp to point to a hunk in ordinary memory
and use it?

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/