Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up

[Jan Engelhardt]

On May 4 2007 22:11, RafaÅ Bilski wrote:
>> 
>>> It has big latency and requires so much preparation that it isn't worth 
>>> if You don't need to save power or cool down CPU. 
>> 
>> I found frequency switching on my VIA to be fast enough.
>
>Timer frequency equal to 1000Hz? 

The regular irq0 timer ticks at 250. What I meant is that I do not have
to wait more than 0.5 seconds for cpufreq-set to finish.


Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/