Re: [-mm patch] mutex.h bogus __must_check (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

[Andrew Morton]

On Sat, 5 May 2007 14:14:44 +0200 Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/
> > 
> __must_check was added to mutex_lock_nested() which returns void. This
> causes the following warnings:
> include/linux/mutex.h:128: warning: 'warn_unused_result' attribute ignored
> 
> This was introduced by
> broken-out/mutex_lock_interruptible-add-__must_check.patch

erp.  It was supposed to be on mutex_lock_interruptible():


--- a/include/linux/mutex.h~mutex_lock_interruptible-add-__must_check-must-fix
+++ a/include/linux/mutex.h
@@ -121,10 +121,10 @@ static inline int fastcall mutex_is_lock
  * Also see Documentation/mutex-design.txt.
  */
 extern void fastcall mutex_lock(struct mutex *lock);
-extern int fastcall mutex_lock_interruptible(struct mutex *lock);
+extern int __must_check fastcall mutex_lock_interruptible(struct mutex *lock);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-extern void __must_check mutex_lock_nested(struct mutex *lock,
+extern void mutex_lock_nested(struct mutex *lock,
 					unsigned int subclass);
 extern int __must_check mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(struct mutex *lock,
 					unsigned int subclass);
_

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/