Re: Getting make net/built-in.o Error with 2.6.21.1 Build

From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Tue May 08 2007 - 12:24:16 EST


On Tue, 8 May 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:

> Sure, my aim here was to only solve the _build breakage_ by fixing the
> Kconfig for this module (that used code from another kernel module
> without listing it in its dependencies). If, as you say, the real
> solution is that we should actually be taking out the offending call to
> the other module itself, then please go ahead -- I don't know much about
> the Bluetooth / HIDP subsytem anyway.

Converting the hid-ff drivers to be also transport-independent is on my
TODO list, but it didn't happen yet.

Marcel - are you aware of any devices currently supported by USB HID
force-feedback code, which have a bluetooth version, please?

I'd propose the patch below, until I make the usbhid force-feedback code
transport independent. Thanks.



From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>

[Bluetooth] HIDP - don't initialize force feedback

The current implementation of force feedback for HID devices is
USB-transport only and therefore calling hid_ff_init() from hidp code is
not going to work (plus it creates unwanted dependency of hidp on usbhid).
Remove the hid_ff_init() until either the hid-ff is made
transport-independent, or at least support for bluetooth transport is
added.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c b/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c
index d342e89..3e77e81 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c
@@ -737,10 +737,8 @@ static inline void hidp_setup_hid(struct
list_for_each_entry(report, &hid->report_enum[HID_FEATURE_REPORT].report_list, list)
hidp_send_report(session, report);

- if (hidinput_connect(hid) == 0) {
+ if (hidinput_connect(hid) == 0)
hid->claimed |= HID_CLAIMED_INPUT;
- hid_ff_init(hid);
- }
}

int hidp_add_connection(struct hidp_connadd_req *req, struct socket *ctrl_sock, struct socket *intr_sock)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/