Re: remove broken URLs from net drivers' output

[Jesper Juhl]

On 10/05/07, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:22:59AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >> I thought it was just an informal tag to mark which people did agree with
> >> the patch (and the line between your "Makes good sense to me." and a "Feel
> >> free to add my ACK to this" is really thin).
> >
> > No, the line is easy and obvious:  if there is any doubt, DO NOT ASSUME.
> >
> > If they do not explicitly ACK it, then do not presume to speak for them.
>
> There is no doubt that Jesper did explicitly ACK the patch.
> We are ONLY discussing whether his informal ACK can be translated into
> an "Acked-by:" line.
Right. The patch is fine. What I said when I commented on it was an
ACK, that's not being debated.
I just thought that Acked-by: was considered a lot more formal and was
surprised to see that line with my name on the patch. But I've since
checked up on that assumption and I can't find anything that states
that it is considered as formal as I thought it was, so the mistake is
all mine and what you did is fine.

If Acked-by: should be made more formal or not is a different discussion.

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/