Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11(PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)

From: Cornelia Huck
Date: Fri May 11 2007 - 03:22:43 EST


On Thu, 10 May 2007 16:55:54 +0200,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Phillip Susi wrote:
> > Stefan Richter wrote:
> >> The SCSI stack already has infrastructure for multi-threaded discovery
> >> and probing.
> >
> > So? It would still benefit from using a generic framework that other
> > buses can use as well.
>
> Perhaps, perhaps not. Many details of the If and How of asynchronous,
> parallelized probing rest with the low-level drivers.

A mix of bus/driver parallelism would probably be the most flexible
approach.

> [BTW, which ever team attempts to design this generic framework please
> brings in detailed knowledge of a variety of bus architectures. I for
> one would like to contribute with what I know about IEEE 1394, but
> before that I still have to experiment on my own before I have a good
> understanding of how to parallelize IEEE 1394 scanning and probing, and
> the IEEE 1394 core is being radically reworked at the moment anyway.]

I guess I'm too tainted by s390 :/ (which in comparison provides a
quite unified way at probing), but I'd be happy to contibute my
experiences as well.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/