Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 18 May 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:

> However we don't have to let those 8 bytes go to waste: we can use them
> to store the virtual address of the page, which kind of makes sense for
> 64-bit, because they can likely to use complicated memory models.

That is not a valid consideration anymore. There is virtual memmap update 
pending with the sparsemem folks that will simplify things.

> Many batch operations on struct page are completely random, and as such, I
> think it is better if each struct page fits completely into a single
> cacheline even if it means being slightly larger.

Right. That would simplify the calculations.
 
> Don't let this space go to waste though, we can use page->virtual in order
> to optimise page_address operations.

page->virtual is a benefit if the page is cache hot. Otherwise it may 
cause a useless lookup.

I wonder if there are other uses for the free space?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/