Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-stablereview)

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:14:08 +0200
Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Compiling now. I had lost a lot of time because at first try it stopped
> in ntfs:
> 
>   CC [M]  fs/ntfs/super.o
> fs/ntfs/super.c: In function ___init_ntfs_fs___:
> fs/ntfs/super.c:3152: error: expected ___)___ before ___NTFS_VERSION___
> fs/ntfs/super.c: At top level:
> fs/ntfs/super.c:3262: error: expected ___,___ or ___;___ before ___NTFS_VERSION___
> make[2]: *** [fs/ntfs/super.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [fs/ntfs] Error 2
> make: *** [fs] Error 2
>   
> I suppose because NTFS_VERSION were defined as EXTRA_CFLAGS too in the Makefile, 

ntfs is being naughty.

--- a/fs/ntfs/Makefile~a
+++ a/fs/ntfs/Makefile
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ ntfs-objs := aops.o attrib.o collate.o c
 	     index.o inode.o mft.o mst.o namei.o runlist.o super.o sysctl.o \
 	     unistr.o upcase.o
 
-EXTRA_CFLAGS = -DNTFS_VERSION=\"2.1.28\"
+EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DNTFS_VERSION=\"2.1.28\"
 
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_NTFS_DEBUG),y)
 EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DDEBUG
_


akpm:/usr/src/linux-2.6.22-rc2> grep -r EXTRA_CFLAGS . | fgrep '+=' | wc -l 
131
akpm:/usr/src/linux-2.6.22-rc2> grep -r EXTRA_CFLAGS . | fgrep -v '+=' | wc -l 
55

hm, lots of Makefiles commit the same sin.  Sam, is this as busted as
I think it is?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/