Re: PCIE

[David Miller]

From: Grant Grundler <grundler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:55:15 -0600

> MSI (and MSI-X) vectors are required to be exclusive.
> I submitted that change to pci.txt last year:
> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/25/2
> 
> and ISTR I've posted that bit of the PCI spec a few years ago.
> But it probably was to linux-pci mailing list only.

This requirement only extends to the PCI host controller,
how that interfaces to the cpu and it's limitations is
an entirely other matter.

> > I can imagine many systems where the cpu simply doesn't have enough
> > interrupt pins to uniquely identify every possible MSI interrupt
> > source.
> 
> The cpus haven't been using interrupt pins for a long time now.
> Anything with a Local-xAPIC is already using transactions to
> signal interrupts even if the OS isn't aware of it.

I'm not talking about x86, x86_64, et al.

I'm talking about embedded ARM chips and the like, and yes they
very possibly will be using PCI-E controllers at some point.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/