Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

[Matt Mackall]

On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:01:09PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * K.R. Foley <kr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * K.R. Foley <kr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > >> Ingo,
> > >>
> > >> I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to 
> > >> 2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3.
> > > 
> > > yes - it includes all of 2.6.21.3.
> > > 
> > > 	Ingo
> > > 
> > 
> > So actually it is not really misnamed, it's just done a bit 
> > differently than previous versions. Sorry.
> 
> yeah. Maybe we should make the 2.6.21.3 -rt patches relative to 2.6.21.3 
> - but that would be one extra patching step for people who already have 
> a 2.6.21 tree. But ... maybe that makes the most sense after all.

Including 2.6.21.3 in your patch will break ketchup.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/