Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:

[Scott Preece]

On 6/1/07, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "John Anthony Kazos Jr." <jakj@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Indeed. Acked-by: implies authority, and only very few people should be
> > able to do it. Namely, the only person who can ACK a patch is a person who
> > could also NACK a patch and expect it to actually be dropped. If I think a
> > patch is bad, I can say so, but as I have no authority, my statement would
> > be taken on merit alone, whereas Linus or Andrew or such could just NACK
> > it and move on without having to spew a blurb every time.
>
> Everyone always has some authority so everyone can ack or nack any
> patch and I hope the action taken will always depend on merit
> rather than person, especially if it's a technical issue and not
> some style etc. thing.
> --
> Krzysztof Halasa
---

This is a question worth answering - is it rude to ack/nak a patch if
you're not a maintainer or otherwise known-to-be-trusted, or is it OK
for anyone to express an opinion? Andrew's patch text seems to imply
that it's generally OK.

scott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/