Re: [RFC 1/4] CONFIG_STABLE: Define it

From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Fri Jun 01 2007 - 16:21:24 EST


On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:02:00PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > + sym = sym_lookup("DEVEL_KERNEL", 0);
> > > + sym->type = S_BOOLEAN;
> > > + sym->flags |= SYMBOL_AUTO;
> > > + p = getenv("DEVEL_KERNEL");
> > > + if (p && atoi(p))
> > > + sym_add_default(sym, "y");
> > > + else
> > > + sym_add_default(sym, "n");
> > > +
> >
> > sym_set_tristate_value(sym, yes);
> > else
> > sym_set_tristate_value(sym, no);
> >
> > should do the trick (untested).
>
> Odd. What's the third state ? Undefined?
no, mod, yes
Representing: no, module, yes as the three config choices.

Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/