Re: [RFC] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add rules for goto labels

[Jeff Garzik]

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:43:51AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Jun 4 2007 10:27, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>> Seconded.  All my code contains the goto label in the first column.
> >>>
> >>> IMO any other goto label indentation is silly, because it obscures the
> >>> goto label within the code block.
> >> I would have to disagree with this.  IMNSHO, a goto label is like a case
> >> label, and they should be treated the same way.
> > 
> > But gotos are special. ("Evil" minus the "it's good for unrolling in case of an
> > error" case).
> > 
> 
> So?
> 
> You still want them to be associated with the level the bailout happens at.

A matter of opinion :)  I tend to think goto is special enough to
warrant column 1 unconditionally.  It is special, so it draws additional
attention over and above case labels.

I and others have been tripped up when programmers "hide" goto
statements among regular statements.

IMO goto warrants a big flashing "notice me" sign.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/