RE: 2.6.22-rc: regression: no irda0 interface (2.6.21 was OK), smsc does not find chip

From: Linus Walleij (LD/EAB)
Date: Tue Jun 05 2007 - 08:06:29 EST


Andrey wrote:

> And here is what PnP tells us:
> {pts/1}% cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0a/options
> port 0x100-0x130, align 0xf, size 0x8, 16-bit address decoding irq
> 3,4,5,6,7,10,11 High-Edge dma 1,2,3 16-bit compatible
> Dependent: 01 - Priority acceptable
> port 0x3f8-0x3f8, align 0x0, size 0x8, 16-bit address decoding
> Dependent: 02 - Priority acceptable
> port 0x2e8-0x2e8, align 0x0, size 0x8, 16-bit address decoding
> Dependent: 03 - Priority acceptable
> port 0x2f8-0x2f8, align 0x0, size 0x8, 16-bit address decoding
> Dependent: 04 - Priority acceptable
> port 0x3e8-0x3e8, align 0x0, size 0x8, 16-bit address decoding
> {pts/1}% cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0a/resources
> state = disabled
> {pts/1}% sudo sh -c 'echo activate >
/sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0a/resources'
> {pts/1}% cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0a/resources
> state = active
> io 0x100-0x107
> io 0x2e8-0x2ef
> irq 5
> dma 1

These values *could* be correct (not all PnP BIOS:es can be trusted,
apparently). What we need to do really, is to get PnP working
properly with smsc-ircc2 and the pass these PnP settings through
as if they were parameters to the module, in the call to
smsc_ircc_preconfigure_subsystems() in the smsc_ircc_init() call.
Then it will (probably) preconfigure the bridge for the
correct ports all the time.

The static table I've put in there just happens to be factory
defaults on a few machines, subject to change whenever some HW
is added/removed I believe.

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/