Re: [PATCH] update checkpatch.pl to version 0.03

[Jesper Juhl]

On 04/06/07, Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This version brings a host of changes to cure false positives and
> bugs detected on patches submitted to lkml and -mm.  It also brings
> a number of new tests in response to reviews, of particular note:

I have a few ideas for additional checks you could add to that script:

- Source files should be 7bit ASCII and Documentation/Kbuild
files/etc should be UTF-8, test that the patch honors that and doesn't
put something else in (cleanups that remove 8bit ASCII etc from a
source file is OK though).

- Check that nothing in the patch touches any file from Documentation/dontdiff

- Check for an excessive number of blank lines - some people have a
nasty tendency to put 3 or more blank lines between functions or
between comments and next source line etc.

- Check that all newlines added by the patch are "\n", not "\r",
"\r\n" or "\n\r".

- Check that, if the patch adds a new file, the new file ends with a newline.

- Warn about usage of the "register" keyword.

- Maybe warn about usage of float/double in source files?

- 'return' is not a function, so warn about patches that think it is
and use 'return(expr);' (this one is tricky since 'return (expr);' can
be OK in some cases.


That's all I can come up with at the moment. If more ideas pop up I'll
let you know.
Good work with that script btw.


--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/