Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] bug removing ehci-hcd

From: Satyam Sharma
Date: Thu Jun 07 2007 - 01:52:42 EST


Hi,

I remember this one ...

On 6/7/07, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:26:10AM -0500, Stuart_Hayes@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> I wasn't actually able to reproduce the bug myself, but I guess it is
> pretty obvious that I shouldn't have called cpufreq_unregister_notifier
> with a spinlock held. I haven't been doing this long enough to know
> exactly which kernel this patch should be against, so let me know if
> this ins't good. Thanks!
>
>
> This patch (for the 2.6.21.3 kernel plus previously sent cpufreq
> notifier patch) fixes a bug caused by calling
> cpufreq_unregister_notifier (which can sleep) while holding a spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Hayes <stuart_hayes@xxxxxxxx>

Hm, this doesn't apply to the 2.6.21.3 kernel.

The cpufreq patches only live in -mm as of now ...

Can you send both patches merged together?

And is the fix already in Linus's tree?

Andrew seems to have already fixed this in the latest -mm
(in this very thread, funnily enough, looks like you missed it
as the subject change broke the threading :-)

[ There is a subtle difference, however, in that Andrew's
fix pushes the notifier unregistration /after/ the
spin_unlock_irq(&ehci->lock) critical section whereas Stuart
seems to be prefer doing it /before/ the corresponding
spin_lock_irq() ... ]

Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/