Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jun 19, 2007, "Dave Neuer" <mr.fred.smoothie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 6/19/07, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> But it takes only a small fraction of the tivoizers to decide to take
>> out the locks, when faced with the costs mentioned above, for us to
>> gain contributions from even a small fraction of their user base
>> (which would then grow in hacker density as a result of
>> non-tivoization) for us to end up better off.

> Even if you're correct, that only takes into account the manufacturers
> who are using Linux _now_ who might be pressured to allowed modified
> versions to run. What about the lost opportunity cost of all of the
> future manufacturers who decide to use ProprietaryOS + locks instead
> of Linux? We don't get any of their code.

True.  This is not left out of my complete argument, though.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/