Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

From: Stephen Clark
Date: Thu Jun 21 2007 - 15:20:03 EST


David Schwartz wrote:

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:55:10 -0700





"David Schwartz" <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





A key is a number. A signature is a number. They are neither
statements nor
instructions. The argument that GPLv2 prohibits Tivoization is
really and
truly absurd. It has neither a legal nor a moral leg to stand on.





A computer program is a number too.



No, it's not. It can be expressed as a number, but it is not a number.


??? can be expressed as a number, but it is not a number ???
sure its a number.

Keys are purely numbers, they are nothing else. Signatures are pure
primitive facts encoded as numbers (authority X blessed object Y).

A computer program is a set of instructions to accomplish a particular
result. It can be expressed as a number, but that doesn't mean it is a
number.

It might be true in principle to develop a scheme whereby every physical
object uniquely corresponds to an extremely large number. That doesn't turn
physical objects into numbers.

DS


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/





--

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)

"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/