Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals

[Linus Torvalds]

On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> Yeah well... I wanted to have the least surprise path... that is,
> without my patch, signalfd will "sometimes" steal the SIGSEGV depending
> on who races to the lock first

Oh, absolutely. I thought we all agreed that Ben's patch was the right 
thing. It's been merged for some time now (even if it hasn't been merged 
for as long as I initially _thought_, since I had forgotten to apply the 
the first time around ;)

So yes, all my emails have been about the _current_ code. 

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/