Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jun 26, 2007, Al Boldi <a1426z@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Is it in the spirit of GPLv2?

> No, but that's besides the point.

Thanks for informing me about the point *I*'m trying to make ;-)

> You can only hold people responsible for the letter, lest there be chaos.

That's not *quite* how it works, but that's a general idea, yes.

>> How are the sources passed on in this way going to benefit the user or the
>> community?

> They still have to provide the source by other GPL means of their choosing.

This is contradictory.  You said the scenario I described was
permitted, and the scenario included the vendor's refusal to give
customers other copies of the sources.

Which is it?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/