Re: [patch 21/26] Slab defragmentation: support dentry defragmentation

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > +			 * objects.
> > +			 */
> > +			abort = 1;
> 
> It's unobvious why the entire shrink effort is abandoned if one busy dentry
> is encountered.  Please flesh the comment out explaining this.

If one item is busy then we cannot reclaim the slab. So what would be the 
use of continuing efforts. I thought I put that into the description? I 
can put that into the code too.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/