Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface

[James Morris]

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:

> Patch tests fine for me for expected capability behavior with lsm=n,
> lsm=y, lsm=y+capability=y, lsm=y+selinux=y, and lsm=y+caps=y+selinux=y.
> 
> So while I'm opposed to the patch, it appears to be safe.

I've also tested a bunch of scenarios: allmodconfig, lsm=y,cap=n, 
selinux=y,cap=n  etc.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/