Re: [PATCH] fix sparse problems with ARRAY_SIZE

From: Adel Gadllah
Date: Thu Jul 12 2007 - 06:28:31 EST


Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:58:18PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:40:33PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 06:09:48PM +0200, Adel Gadllah wrote:
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -35,7 +35,11 @@ extern const char linux_proc_banner[];
#define ALIGN(x,a) __ALIGN_MASK(x,(typeof(x))(a)-1)
#define __ALIGN_MASK(x,mask) (((x)+(mask))&~(mask))
+#ifdef __CHECKER_
+#define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]))
+#else
#define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + __must_be_array(arr))
+#endif
Al Viro recently gave a hint that he have patches for sparse to not give
spurious ARRAY_SIZE warnings.
I do. Right now it's either 2 or 4 patches away from mainline sparse,
depending on reordering... I'm splitting the last patch in series,
hopefully will reorder and send tonight.

Basically, it's a matter of getting __builtin_compatible_types_p()
implementation (really - evaluate.c:type_difference()) somewhere sane.

Try git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/sparse.git/,
the branch is type_difference

ok a proper fix is always better than a workaround ;)
it seems that ARRAY_SIZE is defined multiple times....
seem wrong... shouldn't all users include linux/kernel.h and use that one?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/