Re: [Question] Hooks for scheduler tracing (CFS)

[Remy Bohmer]

Hello Arjan,

Thanks for this suggestion.
But I looked at Systemtap before, and as I remember, it is very
flexible, but it only traces function calls. (or am I missing
something?)
I also need this scheduler-tracer, besides for fully fledged X86
systems, also for ARM based boards also with a very minimal userland,
and limited flash. So, it has to be lightweight also. I can only use
cross-compilers to build the tools... (something Systemtap is not good
at as I remember...)

So, I am missing something here, or it is unfortunately not what I am
looking for...


Kind Regards,

Remy


2007/7/16, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 21:46 +0200, Remy Bohmer wrote:
> > So I was wondering if anybody knows some tool/kernel mechanism which
> > can do this?
> > If not, I will build a kernel extension for it myself (new extension
> > to 'latency_trace' ?)
>
> systemtap has been able to do such things for me in the past...
>
> --
> if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at)
> linux.intel.com
> Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via
> http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/