[PATCH 4/4] [NET] move __dev_addr_discard adjacent to dev_addr_discard for readability

From: Denis Cheng
Date: Tue Jul 17 2007 - 04:25:57 EST


Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <crquan@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/dev.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 17c9cbd..6357f54 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2715,20 +2715,6 @@ int __dev_addr_add(struct dev_addr_list **list, int *count,
return 0;
}

-static void __dev_addr_discard(struct dev_addr_list **list)
-{
- struct dev_addr_list *tmp;
-
- while (*list != NULL) {
- tmp = *list;
- *list = tmp->next;
- if (tmp->da_users > tmp->da_gusers)
- printk("__dev_addr_discard: address leakage! "
- "da_users=%d\n", tmp->da_users);
- kfree(tmp);
- }
-}
-
/**
* dev_unicast_delete - Release secondary unicast address.
* @dev: device
@@ -2777,6 +2763,20 @@ int dev_unicast_add(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_unicast_add);

+static void __dev_addr_discard(struct dev_addr_list **list)
+{
+ struct dev_addr_list *tmp;
+
+ while (*list != NULL) {
+ tmp = *list;
+ *list = tmp->next;
+ if (tmp->da_users > tmp->da_gusers)
+ printk("__dev_addr_discard: address leakage! "
+ "da_users=%d\n", tmp->da_users);
+ kfree(tmp);
+ }
+}
+
static void dev_addr_discard(struct net_device *dev)
{
netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
--
1.5.2.2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/