Re: Hibernation considerations

From: Alan Stern
Date: Tue Jul 17 2007 - 18:38:36 EST


On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 david@xxxxxxx wrote:

> > But what about the freezer? The original reason for using kexec was to
> > avoid the need for the freezer. With no freezer, while the original
> > kernel is busy powering down its devices, user tasks will be free to
> > carry out I/O -- which will make the memory snapshot inconsistent with
> > the on-disk data structures.
>
> no, user tasks just don't get scheduled during shutdown.

But a user task may be holding a lock which is needed for putting some
device into low-power mode. It can't release that lock if it doesn't
get scheduled.

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/