Re: [PATCH 1/6] compacting file_ra_state

From: Fengguang Wu
Date: Fri Jul 20 2007 - 08:12:08 EST


On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 01:34:42PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Fengguang Wu <wfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Use 'unsigned int' instead of 'unsigned long' for the readahead indexes/sizes.
> >
> > This helps reduce memory consumption on 64bit CPU when
> > a lot of files are opened.
> >
> > Note that the (smaller) 32bit index can support up to 16PB file.
~~~~
sorry, it's 16TB ;)

> > Which should be sufficient large at least for now.
>
> This would add a new limit to 64bit architectures. Surely keeping
> start at pgoff_t will not be a big issue? The other fields can be
> 32bit.

Yeah, it counts for about 4MB memory for 1M opened files.

But, the filp size is now 296 on x86_64, so slab-objects-per-page = 13.
Adding another 4bytes, it remains in 13;
Taking 4bytes more, it increases to 14.
So pgoff_t consumes no more memory actually.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/