Re: [GIT PULL] Trivial sh64 updates for 2.6.23-rc1

[Jan Dittmer]

Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 06:39:08PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> > Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > It's known that empty objects require explicit tuning for the ABI,
> > > however, this has never been anything that was fatal. If you flip
> > > something on within each of those subsystems, does the error go away?
> > Yes, thanks this fixes it. Would you accept a patch to modify the
> > defconfig so that it builds by default? Would be most useful for
> > my pet project (http://l4x.org/k/). A fixed toolchain would of course
> > also be nice.
> I'll certainly apply patches that help getting it building, so feel free
> to send updates for that. As I also noted, the empty object thing is
> non-fatal with my toolchain, so I'd also appreciate it if you could put
> a tarball of yours up somewhere so this is a bit easier to verify. I
> suspect this is just something we're going to have to change in binutils,
> however.

You can find it here:

http://l4x.org/~jdittmer/sh64-linux-binutils-2.17-gcc-4.1.3pre.tar.bz2

binutils 2.17.50.0.17 (from ftp.kernel.org)
gcc 4.1.3 prerelease (svn, fixes a build bug for sh64)

Jan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/