Re: request for patches: showing mount options

From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Fri Jul 27 2007 - 11:43:36 EST


> all - fs has options, but doesn't define ->show_options()
> some - fs defines ->show_options(), but some options are not shown
> noopt - fs does not have options
> good - fs shows all options
> patch - I have a patch

[...]

> > autofs all
>
> I'm not sure I understand this.
> How does autofs show it's options without a ->show_options method?

It doesn't. The "all" means, all of them need to be added to
->show_options(), not that all are shown.

I can see now that this is slightly confusing, sorry.

So the ones that need attention are "all" and "some". The others are
fine in theory. Of course I may have missed something.

> > autofs4 some
>
> OK, uid and gid aren't shown.
> That should be straight forward to fix.
> What's your time frame for this?

ASAP ;)

2.6.24 would be a nice, but it won't be easy...

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/