Re: [LV] [PATCH] avoid negative shifts in radix-tree.c

[Jan-Benedict Glaw]

On Sat, 2007-08-25 16:26:07 +0200, Peter Firefly Lund <firefly@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- lib/radix-tree-old.c	2007-08-25 15:36:40.000000000 +0200
> +++ lib/radix-tree.c	2007-08-25 15:36:51.000000000 +0200
> @@ -980,12 +980,14 @@ radix_tree_node_ctor(void *node, struct 
>  
>  static __init unsigned long __maxindex(unsigned int height)
>  {
> -	unsigned int tmp = height * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
> -	unsigned long index = (~0UL >> (RADIX_TREE_INDEX_BITS - tmp - 1)) >> 1;
> -
> -	if (tmp >= RADIX_TREE_INDEX_BITS)
> -		index = ~0UL;
> -	return index;
> +	unsigned int	tmp   = 
> +	int shift = RADIX_TREE_INDEX_BITS - height * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
> +	unsigned long	index;
> +
> +	if (shift < 0)
> +		return ~0UL;
> +	else
> +		return ~0UL >> shift;
>  }
>  
>  static __init void radix_tree_init_maxindex(void)

`index' seems to be unused now?  And indention does neither follow
kernel coding style, nor this file's style. You'd also hammer out
`tmp' and put its initializer right there where it's used.

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx              +49-172-7608481
Signature of:               TrÃume nicht von Dein Leben: Lebe Deinen Traum!
the second  :

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature