Re: [PATCH 2/5] Use macros instead of TASK_ flags

From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Sat Sep 01 2007 - 22:54:42 EST


On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 10:46:51PM -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Abstracting away direct uses of TASK_ flags allows us to change the
> definitions of the task flags more easily.
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static int has_stopped_jobs(struct pid *pgrp)
> struct task_struct *p;
>
> do_each_pid_task(pgrp, PIDTYPE_PGID, p) {
> - if (p->state != TASK_STOPPED)
> + if (is_task_stopped(p))

Funny how I can't spot these things before I send them.

Fixed locally; I'll see if anyone else spots a problem before I send out
a v3.

--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/