Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs/fsstack/eCryptfs updates/cleanups/fixes

[Al Boldi]

Erez Zadok wrote:
> Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9},
> all in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/.  Before we release any change, we
> test it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes
> over 24 hours straight to get through all of our regressions :-)

I am impressed, thanks!

It's probably a good idea to always point these backports out, whenever 
submitting patches against -mm.  Otherwise, people might forget.

> So we'd be happy to submit those patches to the latest stable kernel. 
> But, are you talking about VFS/ecryptfs patches (which are in the stable
> kernel), or are you talking about Unionfs (which is not)?

I'm talking about Unionfs, which seems like a rather critical feature to 
miss-out on.  BTW, did you ever get that oops-on-umount worked out?


Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/