Re: [PATCH -mm] ssb: Make pcmciahost depend on PCMCIA=y

From: Michael Buesch
Date: Wed Sep 12 2007 - 07:01:36 EST


On Wednesday 12 September 2007 12:17:45 Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:09:09PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 September 2007 04:11:00 Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > SSB uses a bool (SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE) to determine whether to
> > > build in PCMCIA support or not, as the PCMCIA host code itself is
> > > also only a bool, make SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE depend on PCMCIA=y.
> > >
> > > Without this, SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE evaluates to y when PCMCIA
> > > is built as a module, which results in link errors due to the
> > > pcmcia_access_configuration_register() accesses, where the symbol
> > > is only defined in a module.
> > >
> > > --- linux-2.6.23-rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/ssb/Kconfig 2007-09-11 15:15:52.000000000 +0900
> > > +++ linux-2.6.23-rc4-mm1/drivers/ssb/Kconfig 2007-09-12 10:51:53.000000000 +0900
> > > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> > >
> > > config SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE
> > > bool
> > > - depends on SSB && PCMCIA && EXPERIMENTAL
> > > + depends on SSB && PCMCIA=y && EXPERIMENTAL
> > > default y
> > >
> > > config SSB_PCMCIAHOST
> > >
> > >
> >
> > There we go. The usual SELECT dependency hell again...
> > Would changing SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE to tristate also fix it?
> > What would be the sideeffects?
> >
> I tried that first, if you do that you have to change the default to
> SSB && PCMCIA, and then anything that depends on it also has to be a
> tristate. That worked ok for SSB_PCMCIAHOST, but it didn't work ok for
> the b43 wireless + PCMCIA, which is why I opted for the PCMCIA=y thing
> instead, which makes sure that SSB_PCMCIAHOST can't be enabled if PCMCIA
> is modular.

Ok, so much for "SELECT is easy and it works if used correctly..." :)
Well, let's apply that patch then. It needlessly restricts the
choice to not allow modular pcmcia in that case, though.

--
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/