Re: iso9660 vs udf

[Karel Zak]

On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:49:31PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> What goes wrong on the mount side is that when it hesitates between
> iso9660 and udf it decides for udf when seeing "NSR02".
> Maybe the heuristics in mount should be tuned.

 I'd like to see the CD image (or at least first 2Mb). Also try:

     # blkid -c /dev/null /dev/cdrom
     # /lib/udev/vol_id  /dev/cdrom

 Maybe vol_id provides better information -- the udf/iso code in
 libblkid seems poorer that in libvolume_id.

> If anybody feels responsible for mount and/or this kernel area
> we might discuss.

 mount(8) --> util-linux-ng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


        Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/