Re: [PATCH] [34/50] i386: Fix argument signedness warnings

[Randy Dunlap]

On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:01:16 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> 
> On Sep 22 2007 10:36, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> >> from arch/i386/boot/compressed/misc.c:14:
> >> include/asm/processor.h: In function $B!F(Jcpuid_count$B!G(J:
> >                                       ^^^^^^^^^^           ^^^^^^^^^^
> >> include/asm/processor.h:615: warning: pointer targets in passing
> >> argument 1 of $B!F(Jnative_cpuid$B!G(J differ in signedness
> >
> >> include/asm/processor.h:615: warning: pointer targets in passing
> >> argument 2 of $B!F(Jnative_cpuid$B!G(J differ in signedness
> >
> >> include/asm/processor.h:615: warning: pointer targets in passing
> >> argument 3 of $B!F(Jnative_cpuid$B!G(J differ in signedness
> >
> >> include/asm/processor.h:615: warning: pointer targets in passing
> >> argument 4 of $B!F(Jnative_cpuid$B!G(J differ in signedness
> >                ^^^^^^^^^^            ^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> >Yikes. My bad, I had faulty (default) alpine settings (and a sad
> >combination of LANG=en_US.UTF-8) when I made and sent out that patch.
> >Please ensure that this finally gets committed in a somewhat saner and
> >more readable state to the tree.
> 
> I am not too thrilled about gcc using non-ascii for interpunctuation
> (for Western languages)..

Ack.  I usually build with "LC_ALL=C" to make those readable.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/