Re: [PATCH 1/4] module: implement module_inhibit_unload()

[Tejun Heo]

Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 17:36 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hmmm.... There doesn't seem to any reason why the blocking should be
>> after calling ->exit().  And, yeah, it would be more useful and
>> intuitive if blocking happens before ->exit().  What do you think?
> 
> *That* I have no problem with.
> 
> I was going to say "just grab a reference to every module" except if a
> new module is loaded you don't know about it.
> 
> If you move your blocking, it seems fine.

Great, I think I was too occupied with the sysfs case when I was writing
it.  I'll update the patch.  Thanks a lot.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/