[PATCH 28/51] [GFS2] Patch to protect sd_log_num_jdata

From: swhiteho
Date: Thu Oct 04 2007 - 05:28:17 EST


From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx>

This is a patch to GFS2 to protect sd_log_num_jdata with the
gfs2_log_lock. Without this patch, there is a timing window
where you can get hit the following assert from function
gfs2_log_flush():

gfs2_assert_withdraw(sdp,
sdp->sd_log_num_buf + sdp->sd_log_num_jdata ==
sdp->sd_log_commited_buf +
sdp->sd_log_commited_databuf);

I've tested it on my roth cluster and it fixes the problem.

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/lops.c b/fs/gfs2/lops.c
index a0371f8..7ef3356 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/lops.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/lops.c
@@ -492,11 +492,12 @@ static void databuf_lo_add(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_log_element *le)

gfs2_trans_add_gl(bd->bd_gl);
if (gfs2_is_jdata(ip)) {
- sdp->sd_log_num_jdata++;
gfs2_pin(sdp, bd->bd_bh);
tr->tr_num_databuf_new++;
}
gfs2_log_lock(sdp);
+ if (gfs2_is_jdata(ip))
+ sdp->sd_log_num_jdata++;
sdp->sd_log_num_databuf++;
list_add(&le->le_list, &sdp->sd_log_le_databuf);
gfs2_log_unlock(sdp);
--
1.5.1.2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/