Re: static LSM objection

[Kees Cook]

On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 02:42:27PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> I just wanted to voice my opinion about the static LSM changes.

Through the magic of greylisting (thanks vger) and IRC, I've just had a
chat with Arjan and GregKH about this stuff.  So, just to follow up for
people interested in watching me talk to myself:

- while an LSM must be compiled in, they are not mutually exclusive,
  and the desired module can be selected at boot-time.

As such, I don't have any strong objections.  It'd be nice for folks
doing LSM development to allow for a way for it to be modular, but I'll let
them fight for that.  :)

Sorry for the noise,

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/