Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

David Chinner wrote:
> You mean xfs_buf.c.
>   

Yes, sorry.

> And yes, we delay unmapping pages until we have a batch of them
> to unmap. vmap and vunmap do not scale, so this is batching helps
> alleviate some of the worst of the problems.
>   

How much performance does it cost?  What kind of workloads would it show
up under?

> Realistically, if this delayed release of vmaps is a problem for
> Xen, then I think that some generic VM solution is needed to this
> problem as vmap() is likely to become more common in future (think
> large blocks in filesystems). Nick - any comments?
>   

Well, the only real problem is that the pages are returned to the free
pool and reallocated while still being part of a mapping.  If the pages
are still owned by the filesystem/pagecache, then there's no problem.

What's the lifetime of things being vmapped/unmapped in xfs?  Are they
necessarily being freed when they're unmapped, or could unmapping of
freed memory be more immediate than other memory?

Maybe it just needs a notifier chain or something.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/