Re: [PATCH 0/9] Remove 'irq' argument from all irq handlers

[Jeff Garzik]

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Once that effort is done, everything should be in the 'trivial' pile and 
> not have the logic that you are worried about (and thus there would be 
> no need to add an additional branch to the error handling path).

er, s/error/irq/

the perils of a multi-threaded brain...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/