Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]

[Chris Wright]

* Jan Engelhardt (jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Oct 22 2007 22:16, Chris Wright wrote:
> >Yes, and I think we can still improve performance although I can't see
> >anyway to help out the modular case, so I guess it will have to incur
> >the hit that's always been there.  I think your Kconfig option is a
> >decent compromise.
> 
> (Un)registering security modules is a one-time hit. You do not load
> and unload modules on a per-minute basis outside debugging.

I'm referring to the hit for indirect calls
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/