Re: [PATCH 13/13] RT: Cache cpus_allowed weight for optimizingmigration

[Gregory Haskins]

On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 02:19 +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:

> Why not make it a task flag, since according to your code, you are only 
> interested whether this is <= 1 or > 1. Since !(x <= 1) <=> (x > 1)
> for any given unsigned integer x, the required data structure is
> a "boolean" or a flag.

Hi Ingo,
  You are correct that the data is in fact interpreted as a boolean.  I
also had considered using a more boolean-like notation at one point.
However, I then figured I went through the expense of computing it, I
might as well store the actual value as an integer in case it can be
used in another way.  But to be honest, I cannot really think of any
other potential uses, so perhaps we would be best to follow your
suggestion.  It could always be changed if such a need ever arises.

Thank you for the feedback!

Regards,
-Greg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part