Re: Kconfig: conf segfault (with invalid kconfig contents)

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Thursday 25 October 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> > It's clearly invalid in that it depends on what it selects, but it should
> > just abort instead.
>
> Thanks for the report and especially for the testcase!
> I will try to look at it a bit later if noone bites me (I'm afraid not).

Well, you're also responsible for it. :)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/6/14

It actually finds the recursive dependency, but it crashes because sym->prop 
is NULL.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/