Re: [PATCH 16/16] make vsmp a paravirt client

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> This patch makes vsmp a paravirt client. It now uses the whole
> infrastructure provided by pvops. When we detect we're running
> a vsmp box, we change the irq-related paravirt operations (and so,
> it have to happen quite early), and the patching function
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64    |    3 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c |    3 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c  |   72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  include/asm-x86/setup.h    |    3 +-
>  4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64 b/arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64
> index 04734dd..544bad5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64
> @@ -148,15 +148,14 @@ config X86_PC
>  	bool "PC-compatible"
>  	help
>  	  Choose this option if your computer is a standard PC or compatible.
> -
>  config X86_VSMP
>  	bool "Support for ScaleMP vSMP"
>  	depends on PCI
> +	select PARAVIRT
>  	 help
>  	  Support for ScaleMP vSMP systems.  Say 'Y' here if this kernel is
>  	  supposed to run on these EM64T-based machines.  Only choose this option
>  	  if you have one of these machines.
> -
>  endchoice
>  
>  choice
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> index 44a11e3..c522549 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  
>  	init_memory_mapping(0, (end_pfn_map << PAGE_SHIFT));
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VSMP
> +	vsmp_init();
> +#endif
>  	dmi_scan_machine();
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
> index 414caf0..547d3b3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
> @@ -8,18 +8,70 @@
>   *
>   * Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
>   * Shai Fultheim <shai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> + * Paravirt ops integration: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>
>   */
> -
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/pci_ids.h>
>  #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
>  #include <asm/pci-direct.h>
>  #include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Interrupt control for the VSMP architecture:
> + */
> +
> +static inline unsigned long vsmp_save_fl(void)
>   

No point being inline.

> +{
> +	unsigned long flags = native_save_fl();
> +
> +	if (flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF)
> +		return X86_EFLAGS_IF;
>   

Is this right, or should the if be testing _AC?  Otherwise, why not just
"return flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF"?

> +	return 0;
> +}
>  
> -static int __init vsmp_init(void)
> +static inline void vsmp_restore_fl(unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	if (flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF)
> +		flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_AC;
> +	if (!(flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF))
> +		flags &= X86_EFLAGS_AC;
>   

Just use "else"?

> +	native_restore_fl(flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void vsmp_irq_disable(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags = native_save_fl();
> +
> +	vsmp_restore_fl((flags & ~X86_EFLAGS_IF));
>   

((double paren?))

> +}
> +
> +static inline void vsmp_irq_enable(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags = native_save_fl();
> +
> +	vsmp_restore_fl((flags | X86_EFLAGS_IF));
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned __init vsmp_patch(u8 type, u16 clobbers, void *ibuf,
> +				  unsigned long addr, unsigned len)
> +{
> +	switch (type) {
> +	case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_irq_ops.irq_enable):
> +	case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_irq_ops.irq_disable):
> +	case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_irq_ops.save_fl):
> +	case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_irq_ops.restore_fl):
> +		return paravirt_patch_default(type, clobbers, ibuf, addr, len);
> +	default:
> +		return native_patch(type, clobbers, ibuf, addr, len);
> +	}
> +
> +}
> +
> +int __init vsmp_init(void)
>  {
>  	void *address;
> -	unsigned int cap, ctl;
> +	unsigned int cap, ctl, cfg;
>  
>  	if (!early_pci_allowed())
>  		return 0;
> @@ -29,8 +81,16 @@ static int __init vsmp_init(void)
>  	    (read_pci_config_16(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_DEVICE_ID) != PCI_DEVICE_ID_SCALEMP_VSMP_CTL))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	/* If we are, use the distinguished irq functions */
> +	pv_irq_ops.irq_disable = vsmp_irq_disable;
> +	pv_irq_ops.irq_enable  = vsmp_irq_enable;
> +	pv_irq_ops.save_fl  = vsmp_save_fl;
> +	pv_irq_ops.restore_fl  = vsmp_restore_fl;
> +	pv_init_ops.patch = vsmp_patch;
> +
>  	/* set vSMP magic bits to indicate vSMP capable kernel */
> -	address = ioremap(read_pci_config(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0), 8);
> +	cfg = read_pci_config(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
> +	address = early_ioremap(cfg, 8);
>  	cap = readl(address);
>  	ctl = readl(address + 4);
>  	printk("vSMP CTL: capabilities:0x%08x  control:0x%08x\n", cap, ctl);
> @@ -42,8 +102,6 @@ static int __init vsmp_init(void)
>  		printk("vSMP CTL: control set to:0x%08x\n", ctl);
>  	}
>  
> -	iounmap(address);
> +	early_iounmap(address, 8);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -
> -core_initcall(vsmp_init);
> diff --git a/include/asm-x86/setup.h b/include/asm-x86/setup.h
> index 071e054..dd7996c 100644
> --- a/include/asm-x86/setup.h
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/setup.h
> @@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ void __init add_memory_region(unsigned long long start,
>  
>  extern unsigned long init_pg_tables_end;
>  
> -
> +/* For EM64T-based VSMP machines */
> +int vsmp_init(void);
>  
>  #endif /* __i386__ */
>  #endif /* _SETUP */
>   

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/