Re: [PATCH] fix i486 boot failure due to stale %ds

[H. Peter Anvin]

Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Maybe not. I had a look in Intel's SDM Vol3, and the
> section "switching to protected mode" specifies that
> a move to %cr0 that sets PE should immediately be
> followed by a far jmp or call. They write that "random
> failures can occur if other instructions exist between
> [the move to %cr0] and [the far jmp/call]". The current
> version of pmjump.S does exactly that: it executes
> a bunch of moves to segment registers in that window.
>
> (Section 9.9.1 in the Sept. 2005 revision I have in
> front of me.)
>
> Similarly, section "serializing instructions" writes
> that a move to %cr0 that enables or disables paging
> should be followed by a jump. They write that this isn't
> required in P4 or P6 family processors, but is required
> for compatibility with other ia32 processors. Reading
> between the lines, they imply that older ia32 processors
> don't treat %cr0 writes as completely serializing.
>
> (Section 7.4 in the Sept. 2005 revision.)

The problem is that Intel has a tendency to exaggerate in their 
documentation; in particular, they tend not to remove restrictions that 
are long-since obsolete.  However, it sounds like you have actually 
found a CPU for which this restriction is motivated.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/