Re: mm snapshot broken-out-2007-11-06-02-32.tar.gz uploaded

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:41:04PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:33:26 -0800 Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:15:09PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:07:12 -0800 Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > [15745.009868]  =======================
> > > > > > [15745.009870] Code: d4 13 00 83 7c 24 04 00 75 0f 8b 43 14 83 c0 0c e8 fc fb ff ff 89 44 24 04 8b 43 14 8b 48 04 8d 53 08 89 50 04 89 43 08 89 4b 0c <89> 11 8b 43 14 83 c0 08 c6 00 01 8b 44 24 04 89 43 10 c7 04 24
> > > > > > [15745.009928] EIP: [<c01c50a2>] kobject_add+0xae/0x160 SS:ESP 0068:cfa37f40
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Don't knowm sorry - we'll need to wait until someone can hit it more
> > > > > reliably :(
> > > > 
> > > > Ah, I have a fix for that, Kay found it.  Do you want an add-on to your
> > > > tree, or a whole new version of one of the patches?
> > > 
> > > Is OK, it looks like I need to resync everyone and undrop various
> > > trees.   A fix for perfmon would be nice.
> > > 
> > > It took five solid hours to get this lot vaguely compiling.  20-30
> > > fix patches needed, several trees dropped, 5-10 patches dropped.
> > 
> > Let me regenerate my tree, drop the block-device patch that you hate so
> > much,
> 
> I don't "hate" it.  It's just that it makes my ydl4.1 G5 no longer boot. 
> This is not an unreasonable objection...

Yes, fair enough, sorry :)

> > and then attack the perfmon code.
> 
> Would be good, thanks - I'll send you a diff.

Got it, thanks.

> >  Should be done in a few hours.
> 
> I won't be pulling the trees again until Friday.

Ok, thanks for the warning.

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/