Re: 2.6.23.1: mdadm/raid5 hung/d-state

[BERTRAND Joël]

Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 11/05/2007 03:36 AM, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> > Neil Brown wrote:
> > > On Sunday November 4, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > # ps auxww | grep D
> > > > USER       PID %CPU %MEM    VSZ   RSS TTY      STAT START   TIME COMMAND
> > > > root       273  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        D    Oct21  14:40
> > > > [pdflush]
> > > > root       274  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        D    Oct21  13:00
> > > > [pdflush]
> > > >
> > > > After several days/weeks, this is the second time this has happened,
> > > > while doing regular file I/O (decompressing a file), everything on
> > > > the device went into D-state.
> > > At a guess (I haven't looked closely) I'd say it is the bug that was
> > > meant to be fixed by
> > >
> > > commit 4ae3f847e49e3787eca91bced31f8fd328d50496
> > >
> > > except that patch applied badly and needed to be fixed with
> > > the following patch (not in git yet).
> > > These have been sent to stable@ and should be in the queue for 2.6.23.2
> >     My linux-2.6.23/drivers/md/raid5.c contains your patch for a long
> > time :
> >
> > ...
> >         spin_lock(&sh->lock);
> >         clear_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
> >         clear_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state);
> >
> >         s.syncing = test_bit(STRIPE_SYNCING, &sh->state);
> >         s.expanding = test_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_SOURCE, &sh->state);
> >         s.expanded = test_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_READY, &sh->state);
> >         /* Now to look around and see what can be done */
> >
> >         /* clean-up completed biofill operations */
> >         if (test_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete)) {
> >                 clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.pending);
> >                 clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.ack);
> >                 clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete);
> >         }
> >
> >         rcu_read_lock();
> >         for (i=disks; i--; ) {
> >                 mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
> >                 struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[i];
> > ...
> >
> > but it doesn't fix this bug.
>
> Did that chunk starting with "clean-up completed biofill operations" end
> up where it belongs? The patch with the big context moves it to a different
> place from where the original one puts it when applied to 2.6.23...
>
> Lately I've seen several problems where the context isn't enough to make
> a patch apply properly when some offsets have changed. In some cases a
> patch won't apply at all because two nearly-identical areas are being
> changed and the first chunk gets applied where the second one should,
> leaving nowhere for the second chunk to apply.

	I always apply this kind of patches by hands, and no by patch command. 
Last patch sent here seems to fix this bug :

gershwin:[/usr/scripts] > cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md7 : active raid1 sdi1[2] md_d0p1[0]
      1464725632 blocks [2/1] [U_]
      [=====>...............]  recovery = 27.1% (396992504/1464725632) 
finish=1040.3min speed=17104K/sec

	Regards,

	JKB
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/