Re: Some interesting observations when trying to optimize vmstathandling

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:

> 
> > There is an interrupt enable overhead of 48 cycles that would be good to
> > be able to eliminate (Kernel code usually moves counter increments into
> > a neighboring interrupt disable section so that __ function can be used).
> 
> Replace the push flags ; popf  with test $IFMASK,flags ; jz 1f; sti ; 1:
> That will likely make it much faster (but also bigger) 

Well maybe we should change local_irq_save/restore in general?

The result would be:


if (!in_interrupt())
	local_irq_disable()

<critical section>

if (!in_interrupt())
	local_irq_enable();



Somehow we need to remember that we disabled interrupts.

Then it get more complicated.


int interrupts_disabled = 0;

if (!in_interrupt()) {
	local_irq_disable():
	interrrupts_disabled = 1;
}

<critical section>

if (interrupts_disabled)
	local_irq_enable();



Not sure that this actually better.


> The only problem is that there might be some code who relies on 
> restore_flags() restoring other flags that IF, but at least for interrupts
> and local_irq_save/restore it should be fine to change.

The statistics code surely does not rely on that.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/