Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Physical PCI slot objects

[Alex Chiang]

Hi Greg,

* Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:31:08PM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote:
> > 
> > FWIW, the ACPI 2.0 spec did not require uniqueness for _SUN.
> > (although there is a strange table that refers to _SUN as the
> > slot-unique ID (table 6-1 in spec v2.0b), the actual definition
> > of _SUN does not mention uniqueness).
> 
> Does your code handle if these are not unique?

I hate to punt on this, but I'm not doing anything that acpiphp
is not doing. If we get back non-unique values for _SUN, I'm
pretty sure both acpiphp and my pci_slot driver will both
continue along as far as they can, until they get an error back
from kobject_register() about trying to register an object with
an existing name.

I think I may have a machine that has non-unique values for _SUN.
If so, I'll try and hunt it down and do some testing.

Thanks for the suggestion.

/ac

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/