Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news

[Paul Mackerras]

Andrew Morton writes:

> I was hoping that after the round of release-and-review which Stephane,
> Andi and I did about twelve months ago that we were on track to merge the
> perfmon codebase as-offered.  But now it turns out that the sentiment is
> that the code simply has too many bells-and-whistles to be acceptable.

Whose sentiment?

I've had a bit of a look at it today together with David Gibson.  Our
impression is that the latest version is a lot cleaner and simpler
than it used to be.  I'm also reading Stephane's technical report
which describes the interface, and whilst I'm only part-way through
it, I haven't seen anything yet which strikes me as unnecessary or
overly complicated.

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/